It allows you to create databases, manager users, and even export your database for backup. Its best feature, to me anyway, is that it will connect to a Mac OS X Server without any issues. Sequel Pro is a full-fledged MySQL administration tool. Sequel Pro is an open source MySQL database administration tool. There is an answer to this issue: Sequel Pro. If you try to connect to a MySQL database running on an OS X Server, you will not be able to do anything, which defeats the whole purpose of being able to administer the database. These tools may work on Windows and Linux, but they have one major shortcoming: they do not work well with a Mac OS X Server. These tools worked well up until the introduction of MySQL Workbench, when all of these separate tools were combined into one interface. These included tools to manage the server, view the data natively and migrate data from another source to MySQL. One of the most popular open source databases is MySQL, and along the way, MySQL has provided tools for database administration. One of the most difficult jobs when doing database administration is the myriad of tools available on each of the different systems. Sometimes they have to be hardware maintenance engineers, other times they have to be website developers, and yet other times they have to be database admins. Java.Many IT people have to wear different hats. Sequel Pro Alternatives: 25+ Database Managers and … Sequel Pro Alternatives for Windows: 25+ Database … Result := (UseRightToLeftAlignment and (X ClientWidth - EditList.ButtonWidth)) TInplaceEditListAccess(EditList).DropDown įunction TValueListEditor.MouseOverButton(X: Integer): Boolean Not EditList.ListVisible and MouseOverButton(X) then If (Button = mbLeft) and (ARow > FixedRows) and Inherited MouseDown(Button, Shift, X, Y) Procedure TValueListEditor.MouseDown(Button: TMouseButton Shift: TShiftState StyleServices.DrawElement(Canvas.Handle, Details, ARect) ItemProps.HasPickList thenĪRect.Left := ARect.Right - EditList.ButtonWidth ĭetails := StyleServices.GetElementDetails(tgDropDownButtonNormal) If (ACol = 1) and (ARow >= FixedRows) and not (gdFocused in AState) and Procedure TValueListEditor.DrawDropDownButton(ACol, ARow: Integer Inherited DrawCellHighLight(R, AState, ACol, ARow) Procedure TValueListEditor.DrawCellHighlight(const ARect: TRect ĪState: TGridDrawState ACol, ARow: Integer) Inherited DrawCell(ACol, ARow, ARect, AState) ĭrawDropDownButton(ACol, ARow, ARect, AState) Procedure TValueListEditor.DrawCell(ACol, ARow: Integer ARect: TRect ![]() ![]() Procedure MouseDown(Button: TMouseButton Shift: TShiftState X, Procedure DrawCellHighlight(const ARect: TRect AState: TGridDrawState Procedure DrawCell(ACol, ARow: Integer ARect: TRect Procedure DrawDropDownButton(ACol, ARow: Integer ARect: TRect įunction MouseOverButton(X: Integer): Boolean ThreadHandle := BeginThread(nil, 0, nil, 0, ThreadId) Procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject) Label1.Caption := 'Action' + IntToStr(Count) Procedure TForm1.Timer1Timer(Sender: TObject) Procedure TForm1.ThreadMessage(var Message: TMessage) PostMessage(ReceiverWnd, TH_MESSAGE, TH_PARAM_FINISH, GetCurrentThreadID) Procedure ThreadMessage(var Message: TMessage) message TH_MESSAGE įunction ThreadProc(Parameter: Pointer): Integer TH_MESSAGE = WM_USER + 1 // Thread message Simply run a GUI update timer in your main thread and have the main thread ask the workers for their current status.Īpplying that idea to your code results in this: Don't post messages from the thread to the main thread. ![]() On the other hand, if all you need to do is report status in your GUI then you should avoid a queue altogether. If there are no other threads ready to run, the function returns immediately, and the thread continues execution. From the documentationĪ value of zero causes the thread to relinquish the remainder of its time slice to any other thread that is ready to run. The call Sleep(0) will yield if there's another thread ready to run. It's complex, hard to implement well, and hurts performance. Typically you'd throttle adaptively by keeping track of the size of the queue. In general you'd need to be more precise about throttling. Perhaps it will throttle too much, perhaps not enough. Your Sleep(1) will throttle, but in a very crude way. And you'll likely need to throttle the thread that adds to the queue. If you absolutely need every single message to be handled by the main thread you'll need to maintain your own queue. You are flooding the message queue at a rate greater than the rate at which the messages are being processed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |